#Limewire peerguardian password
#Limewire peerguardian windows

Would this work? Kushal 18:27, 18 February 2008 (UTC) Reply Hmm, that's kind of cool. Coop is currently under active development. Preceding unsigned comment added by Washii ( talk In the meantime, I'm going to investigate the article's See Alsos. I left a comment there mentioning the extension, though I'd love to see if anybody has heard of anything else like this for Firefox as a simple extension. Washii ( talk) 04:02, 18 February 2008 (UTC) Reply It turns out that there is an article under basically exactly what I want to do: Cobrowsing. Note that I'm not looking for anything that would be seen as a Browser synchronizer. And what does this have to do with random people on AIM? This is for my girlfriend and I to easily share pages back and forth across individual computers (and I tend to browse faster than her). That is, the clients of the Cobrowse server open the same tabs and can all read through them, this in semi-realtime. Kushal one 14:27, 17 February 2008 (UTC) Reply Google Browser Sync is quite a ways over the top.I'm trying to share the actual browsing experience, not any settings.

#Limewire peerguardian password

I do not recommend it sharing your Google account password with random people you might meet on AIM. If you want to share everything, you could use Google Browser Sync and give the other person your Google account ID and password. Anybody know of something similar, hopefully as an extension for Firefox, which may be better-er? Washii ( talk) 09:05, 17 February 2008 (UTC) Reply Unfortunately, this extension seems to be no longer developed (was updated for 2.0 back in Oct '06). Now, it seems that there is an extension for Firefox by the name of Cobrowse: Anyway, MSN had some weird plugin (or did they used to have an overlay of Internet Explorer?) that allowed atleast two users to share a browsing experience. Kirk UK -Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.43.102.147 ( talk) 12:55, 17 February 2008 (UTC) Reply 'Collaborative' Web Browsing īleh, that leaves a bad taste in my mouth. Thanks for that, really useful and informative. Ouro ( blah blah) 09:39, 17 February 2008 (UTC) Reply This might be of use ( ), basically average viewing distance is pretty much equally as important as PPI/DPI. Any stuff above that is printable on larger sheets, as they are conceived to be viewed from a larger distance, so you can live with a lower image resolution. 100 dpi, which should just be just about enough. You could probably blow it up to an A3 poster and not feel any special quality reduction. antilived T | C | G 08:38, 17 February 2008 (UTC) Reply 3000 pixels gives about 250 dpi for an A4 print, which is nice. A billboard may look perfectly fine from your car but each pixel will correspond to something like a 1cm square, which is clearly not acceptable for a 4×6 print. Kirk UK -Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.144.69.28 ( talk) 07:50, 17 February 2008 (UTC) Reply It all depends on the viewing distance. Thanks for the help in advance!- 68.173.40.42 ( talk) 05:35, 17 February 2008 (UTC) Reply Is there difference between widgets and applications Ĭan anyone tell me if there is a rough formula that can be used to calculate the optimum pixel size of an image for printing high quality digital enlargements using wet photo processing (not inkjet printers)? I have an amount of digital art that I wish to get printed at 18' x 12' or 30' x 20' I'm currently working in Photoshop at around 3000 pixels wide but not sure if this is anywhere near high enough.

#Limewire peerguardian windows

I've tried changing the channel number, there are no microwaves or 2.4Ghz phones in the area.Īny ideas on a differential diagnosis? In windows XP, I read about a conflict with the Wireless Zero service, but im running vista and there is no equivalent that i can see. My computer is a brand new dell XPS m1300 with the standard intel wireless chip. I'm running Windows Vista, with a Speedstream 6300 modem, running on WPA-PSK with a very long password, and a group key renewal rate of 3600. So, in the vein of House, here's the list of symptoms: Every ten minutes or so, the video will stop, I'll get a 'limited connectivity' message, and I have to disconnect and reconnect to the network for it to work again. I was trying to watch House online, for free, the other day, and my connection keeps dropping! My wireless internet connection seems to drop ONLY when I'm streaming videos (i.e. I have a bit of a mystery going on with my computer.